Skip to main content

Raising Genderless Babies

Parents regardless of their gender identification have ceased to give their babies a gender at birth "in bid to challenge society's gender bias". Parents are not revealing the sex of the baby to anyone, dressing them up in gender neutral clothing and using "they/them" pronouns rather than "her" or "him". Their goal is to have their baby grow into their own person without having any societal influence on which gender they would like to be.

There has been a lot of backlash as imagined. People are saying that trying to influence the baby's gender is in way influencing them and making them unaware of what is "normal". People are also expressing the discomfort with parents decision to do this because they are worried that they are not letting their kids be kids and exposing them to complicated topics and such a young age. Regardless of the controversy parents are increasingly deciding to not assign genders to their babies. This decision does not only affect people mentally, but it has also led to multiple disputes between schools, hospitals, etc. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

S.2750

S.2750 is the "Preserving Our Commitment to Homeless Veterans Act" was proposed by Senator Nelson (D-FL). The bill requires the Department of Veterans Affairs to provide case management support to local housing authorities under the VA supported housing program. The program assists veterans who are homeless and their families in finding and sustaining permanent housing for homeless Veterans. The federal budget process occurs in two stages: appropriations and authorizations. This bill is considered authorization, which determines how federal funding should be spent. The committees assigned to this bill sent it to the House or Senate as a whole for consideration on November 6, 2019.
Post a Comment
Read more

Do Homeless People "hurt" the Prestige of Major Cities

Trump recently visited California, the country's most populous state, and believed that homeless people ruined the "prestige" of cities like Los Angeles and San Francisco. This stance originated in the concept of being sympathetic towards real estate investors and people's property value or quality of life. Under this administration the federal government is trying to put a foot in city policy concerning housing. Officials are considering "razing" homeless camps and refurbishing government buildings. Comment: If Trump is sympathetic towards people's quality of life, then shouldn't he also sympathize with the homeless people's lives? People who are actually experiencing and poor quality of life. In reality the federal government does not have much of a foothole when it comes to homelessness. It takes multiple organizations and departments. Article
Post a Comment
Read more

The Effects of Cruel ICE Raids

The ICE raid that recently occurred in Mississippi last month left sadness, anxiety, and a dent in the agricultural community. The raid created an immense amount of distress that it eventually led to 300 people being released out of the 680 that were arrested within 24 hours of the raid, keep in mind that this included people who had no criminal record. The effects of these raids are not beneficial and here are the reasons why. America's agricultural business is deeply dependent on undocumented employees, they make up almost 20% of the sector. Very few Americans would be willing to the dangerous and rigorous jobs that these undocumented people are doing. When the raid happened it left businesses anxious because they lost many workers. Businesses who employ undocumented workers will be prosecuted as well. Businesses are not benefiting from these raids and deportations. Large scale detainments result in families being separated. Many of these unauthorized immigrant workers have c
Post a Comment
Read more